Publishing and Reporting AI Research
Standards and best practices for communicating AI research to the clinical community. This section helps researchers produce publications that are rigorous, reproducible, and useful.
Reporting Standards: CONSORT-AI, SPIRIT-AI, TRIPOD+AI, and STARDsoon
The major reporting guidelines for AI clinical studies and diagnostic accuracy studies. What each standard requires, when each applies, and how to use them as a checklist during study design — not just at manuscript submission.
Writing the Methods Section for an AI Studysoon
What must be documented: data sources, inclusion/exclusion criteria, preprocessing, model architecture, training procedure, evaluation protocol, and statistical analysis. Common omissions that undermine reproducibility.
Common Methodological Pitfalls in Medical AI Paperssoon
Data leakage, overfitting to the test set, inappropriate comparisons, missing external validation, cherry-picked metrics, and other errors that weaken or invalidate published results.
Sharing Code, Data, and Modelssoon
Best practices for open science in medical AI. GitHub repositories, model zoos, data sharing agreements, and balancing openness with patient privacy and commercial considerations.
Peer Review of AI Manuscripts: What Reviewers Look Forsoon
Understanding the evaluation criteria that journals and reviewers apply to AI papers. A practical guide for both authors preparing submissions and clinicians asked to review AI research.